Design & Develop
  • Learning the Ropes
  • March23rd

    This has come up a few times in the last month, while we’ve been bidding on projects for the summer months. When looking for an agency to create your new or improved website, it’s important to know and be able to articulate what it is that you need from your web presence.

    It may seem basic, but I can assure you that it is not.

    My advice to anyone seeking a website is to define who is using the site, what they want, and what you want from that interaction before engaging agencies or seeking RFPs.

    By a significant margin, the clients who have projects that go smoothly are the clients who know what they want their websites to achieve.

    Our process at Design & Develop begins with an audit (or a series of audits, depending on your project scope), which we use to define a client’s audience, intentions, and goals. This helps us deliver what clients need and want, however, the process as a whole works better when a client begins with answers that we can help refine and clarify.

    You know the saying “the devil is in the details”? It’s utterly true with website development. The difference in hours between a portal with 4 sub-sites and a website with 4 sections is enormous.

    The more you know, the more we can help: clients know their businesses, we know the web.

  • March10th

    In all of the scramble to get jobs done recently, the fire-to-fire scenario for projects has become a big item on my fix-it list. Nothing drives me more crazy than running from job to job without thought about best process or improvement.

    So, how do I carve a whole lot of items off of my to do list and focus on providing that better level of service? My answer came from an exchange with Rachel Cornell of ProNagger.com, in which she reminded me that for a project to get done, a person has to actually want to do the work. Nagging doesn’t work on a people who avoid tasks because they don’t actually want to do them; nagging works on people who need encouragement and accountability to keep them on track.

    I’ve been creating The List daily, and it’s out of control. There’s no way I can get it all done, which freaks me out, resulting in me dragging my heels on the jobs. I build stories about how there’s no way I can succeed, rather than doing the jobs and succeeding.

    Oh. Wait. That looks like a waste of time. [insert me smacking myself upside the head here]

    So, only 1 goal today: get as far as I can on each of the items on my list by using the timer method.

    I set the timer for a period of time (in today’s case, 30 minutes). I sprint on a task for 30 minutes or until it’s done, which ever comes first. Then I go take a quick break, refresh my glass of water, and do it again. And again. And again. My projected outcome: at the end of the day I can walk away from my desk knowing I accomplished something and I can show progress to an entire list of clients.

    Let’s see how it works.

  • March4th

    With two Alpha dogs in the room, it’s an easy conclusion that there’s eventually going to be a difference of opinion on key issues.

    We’ve been running through a particular situation for almost two weeks, and the initial binary state of Yes/No left us divided, but clear. You say Yes, so you run with it. I say No, so I’ll just pack away my misgivings and support you as much as I can without caving. Oddly, though tension built over that Yes/No, the real tension didn’t start until we both gave into the temptation to build camps and start arguing our cases.

    Why the tension?

    Now we’re stuck in a firm “I don’t know what to do” instead of a clear Yes/No.

    I think we’re being sellouts and encouraging bad behaviour by saying Yes, but we’re in too deep to say No without disgrace. He thinks we’re missing a really good business opportunity by saying No, but is weighing the odds of Yes turning out well.

    I’ve been told that being successful in business requires taking some risks. I’m not sure what we’re risking at this point. Are we risking a project going poorly or our business as a whole? Am I exaggerating the gravity of the situation or diminishing?

    Perhaps it’s time to just flip a coin.

  • February25th

    Last night I had an enlightening chat with Tom St. Louis of Zerald Communications. I ran a few situations past him that have baffled me recently, surrounding the idea of a no-win clause when it comes to clients and contractors.

    Without getting into too much detail, I’ve been struggling with communication (oh, the irony!) and, more specifically, being heard and responded to by people when I think my input is either important or required.

    Tom told me about his two basic rules of marketing:

    1. People won’t believe you, even if you are telling the truth.
    2. People will believe how they feel.

    Personally, I believe in being straightforward and clear about my intentions. I frequently preface things with clients, once we are communicating well, that what I have to say next is just going to be blunt and that no offense is meant. I cut to the chase when it comes to issues like:

    • doing that is going to hurt your business, not help it
    • I cannot meet your requirements, let me get back to you or recommend another agency to help you
    • the information you are using for your strategy is inaccurate or misrepresented
    • you are not receiving accurate value for the money you are spending on X service provider

    The important key is building a relationship and comfort level with the person I’ve been interacting with, before going for the straight line on an issue. For the most part, once clients get their jaw off of the floor over sentences like “your current design firm is ripping you off, has you held hostage to their custom solution, and this makes me very angry. I don’t care if you choose our firm to move forward, but please get rid of them.” the response has been positive.

    I act with integrity. My position is that I know what I’m talking about, that we’re in the room together because I am a professional who has opinions you want to hear, and that if I do not know how to answer your question, I will admit that and offer to find solutions.

    I don’t put all of my cards on the table, but I also don’t hide things or have an ulterior motive – even when it comes to paying my bills with the job we are discussing. If I am not the correct person for the job, no amount of spin is going to alter that fact.

    My current hang-up about being unheard is two-fold:

    • I have not established a relationship with the party (not for lack of trying).
    • How I make this individual feel overrules anything I say.

    My discomfort grows as I watch how this person feels about me come up against who I am and what I stand for: the two ideas do not match, and nothing I say changes the image the other person is working with.

    Being who I am runs the risk of pushing someone’s buttons. It doesn’t matter who I am or what I want, that trigger influences on an unconscious level and isn’t controllable.

    Lessons:

    • Being authentic is important to me.
    • How people feel about who I am overrules who I am, regardless of the facts I place on the table.
    • There are better ways to project myself; this isn’t an invitation to change, but a call to action about watching how my presentation makes someone else feel, since that is the overruling item for decision making.

    All seems obvious, right? However, mix in projects worth significant amounts of money, and the waters become muddy. Do I sacrifice my integrity a little to open doors for my company or do I go along with things that are not wrong, but do not match my projection of who I am and how I conduct business and relationships?

    How do I shift that feeling in others without sacrificing myself in the process?